Thursday, January 26, 2012
• •
Rich advice for Romney
Hillary Chabot and Jerry Kronenberg, Boston Herald
Capitalism |
Edward Hudgins of the Atlas Society, which promotes the ideas of late uber-capitalist Ayn Rand, said Romney should stop his sheepish efforts to explain away his wealth. “I would like to see Romney take the moral high ground and take pride in his wealth,” he said.
• •
The United States of Envy
Terence Corcoran, National Post
Capitalism |
Preoccupation with the incomes of Mr. Romney and the U.S. rich represents class warfare that is also a war on America’s past. Ayn Rand famously also said: “The upper classes are merely a nation’s past; the middle class is its future.” From out of today’s middle class will come tomorrow’s rich. Mr. Obama’s attack on today’s rich is also an attack on tomorrow’s rich, aiming to foreclose on the future ability of American’s to get rich being capitalists.
•
How Steven Tyler, Newt Gingrich and Rand Paul made their way into our Monday consciousness
Jon Dawson, The Free Press (Kinston, NC)
U.S. Sen. Rand Paul was momentarily detained by airport security in Nashville on Monday. Various media outlets reported something caused a metal detector to start beeping along to the tune of “2112” by Rush. Sen. Paul then refused to let the rather swarthy-looking members of the TSA pat him down to search for whatever was causing the metal detector to start humming the praises of Ayn Rand.
•
The cult of Ron Paul: revisited
Devin Wallace, Albany Times Union - Tea Party Voices
It’s a black or white world in the Ron Paul camp. You’re either with them on the side of “liberty” or you’re part of the Federal Reserve conspiracy handed down from the lamestream media and eaten up by the drones and the sheeple. There is very little middle ground. Everyone is conspiring against them in their mind; there is no rational explanation why a man like Dr. Paul could ever lose. They fail to acknowledge systemic problems and instead focus on the bogeymen. It’s not an economic system focused on the utter pillaging of the environment, one committed to sucking out every last cent from every last exploited worker. No, it’s Ben Bernanke. Or the rest of the banking cartel, or the globalist, or the climate change agenda, or anyone else who doesn’t subscribe to their Randian view of the world.
•
The Lost Poet
Mark Christensen, Willamette Week (Portland, OR)
With the passion of a Sepp Dietrich exhorting his doomed troops before the Battle of the Bulge, [Marty Christensen] rallied to the defense of Oregon’s psychedelic answer to William Faulkner and Ayn Rand. “THEY CAN’T DO THIS TO KEN KESEY! THEY CAN’T GET AWAY WITH IT!” What he was alluding to is the Milos Foreman film of Kesey’s One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, which Kesey, who did not cotton to the script, Jack Nicholson or his cut of the profits, was unhappy about.
•
I Love, Therefore I’m Nuts
Liz Langley, SexIs Magazine
Personal life |
Book review: Great Philosophers Who Failed at Love, by Andrew Shafffer.Shaffer gives us the skinny on the private lives of 37 philosophers, all full of various types of affairs, angst, desire, despair and scandal in nicely portioned bite-sized pieces, perfect for the short-attention span reader who likes to graze and jump around (as I do). [....] There are, interestingly, only two women represented but those — Ayn Rand and Simone de Beauvoir have juicy stories to their credit.
• •
Mediocre line-up
Frontline (India)
Individual Rights |
Ron Paul [is] an ideologically committed libertarian, whose affinity to the ideas of Ayn Rand often takes him to reasonable positions (anti-war, for instance), but which more often allows him to enter very bizarre territory (he opposes the Civil Rights Act on the grounds that it threatened property rights, the right to do what you want in your own establishment, including decline service to those whom you do not like).
•
The Razzie Awards are Going to be a Little Different This Year…
William Bibbiani, Crave Online
Atlas Shrugged movie |
Likely candidates for this year’s Worst Film include such high profile stinkers as Green Lantern, The Smurfs and Sucker Punch, but maybe they’ll be able to make room for such lower-profile crapfests as Atlas Shrugged and Sanctum this time out.
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
• •
Unhappy senator sees equality as distraction
Erika Shepard, Bellingham Herald (WA)
Individual Rights |
Ayn Rand was right when she said “Individual rights are not subject to a public vote; a majority has no right to vote away the rights of a minority; the political function of rights is precisely to protect minorities from oppression by majorities.”
• •
Two ideas for dealing with poor
Ray Zagorski, Post-Crescent (Appleton, WI)
Inaccurate |
We have, on one hand, the prevalent philosophy of Ayn Rand that looks at the poor as parasites, as nonpersons. And, on the other hand, we have the Supreme Court designating wealthy corporations as persons with power to rule. What does Jesus say?
• •
Built on Shifting Sands
Richard Girard, OpEdNews
This is what is wrong with reactionary radicalism: whether it is Socrates decrying Athenian democracy, or Ayn Rand complaining about our modern equivalent: They always argue that they are superior, and must be atop the hierarchy that they create.
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
• •
Harper’s Publisher Fights Back Over ‘Lapham’s Disease’ Dig
Kat Stoeffel, New York Observer
Bloomberg View columnist Michael Kinsley’s [New York Times] review of Baffler editor and Harper’s columnist Thomas Frank’s conservative-debunking tract, Pity the Billionaire, elicited two spirited letters from Mr. Frank’s corner. Chris Lehmann, a fellow Baffler-er, wrote in to defend the book’s focus on Ayn Rand. Mr. Kinsley had written that Mr. Frank’s notion that Atlas Shrugged played a role in right wing ideology was “far-fetched.”
• •
Understanding Mitt Romney's Bain Problem
Scott Galupo, US News & World Report
Capitalism |
Lots of people, on both the left and right, are deeply uncomfortable with this nebulous idea of “wealth.” This is the source of Rep. Ron Paul’s discomfort with “fiat money.” At the risk of oversimplifying, Marx believed value is produced by physical exertion—turning a tree into a rocking chair, for instance. The adherents of Ludwig von Mises and Ayn Rand, meanwhile, believe more broadly that value is produced by entrepreneurship and genius. Needless to say, we left behind that simple world—if it ever truly existed—a long time ago.