Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Sunday, April 08, 2012
Saturday, March 31, 2012
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
• • •
Ayn Rand Nation: Look Elsewhere To Learn About Ayn Rand
,
Objectivist author |
Imagine a lecture on the ideas of Ayn Rand – or on those of Immanuel Kant, or John Locke, or Plato, or Aristotle, or on the philosophical system of any major thinker of the past – delivered by Ronald MacDonald in full clown regalia. Pretty ludicrous? Picture it combined with the rhetorical equivalent of “death by a thousand chortles,” punctuated with spittle-spewing Bronx cheers. Pretty disgusting? Not very amusing? Then you will have an idea of the nature and purpose of Gary Weiss’s book on Rand and Objectivism, Ayn Rand Nation: The Hidden Struggle for America’s Soul.
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
• •
The ‘False Alarm’ of the Latest Executive Order
,
Atlas Shrugged |
Objectivist author |
On Sunday morning, March 18th, I learned about the National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order, signed into law by President Barack H. Obama on March 16th. As some news blogs noted, Friday was a curious time to inform the nation of the NDRP EO, or “EO 12919” (for Executive Order), an EO to which the mainstream media seemed oblivious and un-newsworthy. I immediately recalled Directive 10-289 from Ayn Rand’s prophetic novel, Atlas Shrugged, in which the Head of State, at the behest of his national economic planner, issues a decree that freezes everyone and everything in place to combat an ongoing, government-caused national “emergency.”
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Sunday, December 18, 2011
Wednesday, December 07, 2011
Saturday, November 05, 2011
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
• •
Much Ado about Nothing: Fatal Fallacies about “Palestine”
,
Objectivist author |
“Peace” with the Palestinians is also a fallacy. As Ayn Rand succinctly put it, “In any compromise between food and poison, it is only death that can win.” And the Palestinians are a tribe poisoned by generations of racial and religious hate. It is a population of nihilists, of zeroes. They are ruled by a terrorist organization that has declared Israel illegitimate and a legitimate target for eradication.
Tuesday, May 03, 2011
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
• •
Lara Logan and the drooling beast
,
The Fountainhead |
Objectivist author |
“…I know the kind of terror it is….Listen, what’s the most horrible experience you can imagine? To me – it’s being left, unarmed, in a sealed cell with a drooling beast of prey or a maniac who’s had some disease that’s eaten his brain out. You’d have nothing then but your voice – your voice and your thought. You’d scream to that creature why it should not touch you, you’d have the most eloquent words, the unanswerable words, you’d become the vessel of the absolute truth. And you’d see living eyes watching you and you’d know that the thing can’t hear you, that it can’t be reached, not reached, not in any way, yet it’s breathing and moving there before you with a purpose of its own. That’s horror. Well, that’s what’s hanging over the world, prowling somewhere through mankind, that same thing, something closed, mindless, utterly wanton, but something with an aim and a cunning of its own….” –Steve Mallory to Howard Roark in Ayn Rand’s The Fountainhead.
Friday, February 04, 2011
Thursday, January 13, 2011
•
The scarecrow of “violent language”
,
Objectivist author |
Since long before Barack Obama was elected president, no Republican, no member of the Tea Party, no conservative, no libertarian, no Objectivist, no prominent “anti-government” activist has ever advocated assassination or even an armed rebellion against the federal government. The best of these individuals has simply reminded the administration and Congress of the proper role of government in as forceful language as possible – note that the term is forceful language, not forceful action.
Monday, November 01, 2010
• •
The incontrovertible dead-end of Islam
,
Objectivist author |
As Ayn Rand might have put it: “You can’t have your mystic of muscle and deny him, too.”
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Thursday, September 16, 2010
•
Burning the First Amendment
,
Atlas Shrugged |
Objectivist author |
Pastor [Terry] Jones had a fundamental right to burn his Korans. They were his private property, or his church‘s. It was his or the church’s money. His gesture was loony, not “counter-productive” as some pundits have claimed, but rather a futile protest against the Ground Zero mosque and Islamic terrorism. It may have even been a bid for publicity, which he certainly garnered. What about burning Bibles, or copies of Mein Kampf, or Das Kapital, or even Atlas Shrugged, or the Harry Patter novels? The same principle applies. Freedom of speech is inherently linked to private property. If property is regulated, controlled, or abolished, then, by extension, so is speech. This is what Obama, Cass Sunstein, and the FCC are creeping up to in wanting to regulate the Internet through “net neutrality.”
Monday, September 13, 2010
• •
“Emotionalism” and the Ground Zero mosque
,
Objectivist author |
What is an emotion? Ayn Rand, the novelist-philosopher, noted that “There can be no causeless love or any sort of causeless emotion. An emotion is a response to a fact of reality, an estimate dictated by your standards,” and also that, “An emotion is an automatic response, an automatic effect of man’s value premises. An effect, not a cause. There is no necessary clash, no dichotomy between man’s reason and his emotions—provided he observes their proper relationship.”
Tuesday, September 07, 2010
• • •
The fatal links of servitude
,
Atlas Shrugged |
The Fountainhead |
Individualism |
Objectivist author |
I have always questioned the fearful reluctance of conservatives to champion the likes of Howard Roark and John Galt, or to acknowledge that they are the fundamental models of what this culture needs more of. I have always suspected that these heroes represent a morality as much a perilous nemesis to conservatives as they represent to the Obamas and Pelosis of the world. Roark and Galt are deemed “too extreme” examples of individualism. But in the final analysis, their “extremism” is precisely what makes living and innovation and progress possible, and their freedom to live and act for their own reasons are primary requisites, not families, churches, or society. No productive individual honestly acts out of a sense of family, church, or society. If he claims he does, he is deceiving himself and perpetuating a fraud.